If you haven’t received your verification email, please Contact Us
Screen cryptocurrency activity against addresses from active law enforcement investigations to add external context to monitoring, investigations, and reporting.
Pattern‑driven transaction monitoring flags addresses without external investigative context. Compliance teams struggle to distinguish higher‑exposure activity from routine behavior, overwhelming resources with alerts that are difficult to prioritize.
Regulators require documented justification for SARs, account actions, and transaction decisions. Pattern‑based tools alone cannot provide the independent sourcing examiners often look for during reviews.
Compliance analysts spend weeks investigating flagged addresses without access to law enforcement case data—duplicating investigative work already completed by agencies.
No standardized mechanism exists for financial institutions to validate suspicious addresses against law enforcement investigations or coordinate with investigating agencies.
Query cryptocurrency addresses against confirmed law enforcement investigations from participating agencies. Validate whether flagged addresses are subjects of active cases without accessing case files or compromising operations.
Generate compliance reports citing law enforcement investigation data as authoritative source for suspicious activity determinations. Documentation designed for regulatory examinations and audit defense.
Encrypted communication channels enable direct coordination with investigating agencies for additional context on flagged addresses—supporting both compliance objectives and active investigations.
Query cryptocurrency addresses against a database of confirmed law enforcement investigations. Real‑time results indicate whether an address is the subject of an active case and the associated investigative context.
Automated report generation citing law enforcement case data for SAR narratives, account closure documentation, and transaction decisions. Formatted for examiner review and regulatory defense.
Direct, encrypted channels to investigating agencies for additional context on flagged addresses. Supports compliance due diligence while maintaining investigative confidentiality.
RESTful API integrates with transaction monitoring systems, case management platforms, and compliance workflows. Enables automated address screening within existing infrastructure.
Compliance decisions supported by law enforcement investigation data—an independent source for attributing higher‑exposure activity. Strengthens examiner defense and helps reduce regulatory risk.
Validate flagged addresses in seconds instead of weeks of manual investigation. Reduces low‑value workload and reallocates analyst time to the activity that matters most.
Documentation cites law enforcement case data as authoritative source. Provides examiner-acceptable justification for SARs, account actions, and transaction decisions during audits.
Access network intelligence from hundreds of law enforcement agencies nationwide. Provides a breadth of visibility that cannot be achieved from a single institution’s data alone.
Eliminate weeks of manual research per flagged address. Access law enforcement case context immediately instead of issuing subpoenas or conducting independent blockchain analysis.
Complete documentation of queries, reports generated, and agency communications. Supports regulatory examinations, internal audits, and compliance governance requirements.
Multi-factor authentication and agency verification processes restrict platform access to authorized law enforcement personnel only.
Platform collects cryptocurrency addresses only. No personally identifiable information, case files, or sensitive investigative details collected or stored.
All communications and intelligence products protected by enterprise-grade encryption.
Complete activity documentation supports internal agency oversight and accountability requirements.